Oh man, going Nxe4 then back to f6 seems awful but maybe since white already went nef3-e5-f3 it's ok?
How to beat the Petrov seems like a title with an unsubstantiated claim.
You present two example games, but Caruana games seem more like it.
Carlsen could not beat the Petrov.
You present two example games, but Caruana games seem more like it.
Carlsen could not beat the Petrov.
It has a ? at the end though :). Like maybe this is the answer. 0r maybe not! @tpr
#13
Like: "How to become a millionaire overnight?"
The Petrov is rock solid and was the preferred defence of Pillsbury, Petrosian, Karpov, Caruana...
Like: "How to become a millionaire overnight?"
The Petrov is rock solid and was the preferred defence of Pillsbury, Petrosian, Karpov, Caruana...
@tpr Of course I have not refuted the Petroff! That was just the name of the study. How to beat the Petroff was actually a book by Kotronias and some other guy whose name I have forgotten. The title of the study was based from that. Also, for example one of Chessable courses is named Break down Anti-Sicilians. If White manages to retain equality in one variation or is able to force a perpetual you certainly aren't gonna tell the author (a GM) that his claim was wrong?!
@Fingerbang I have added a section on 5...Nf6?!
#15
Book authors - or their editors - chose book titles to boost sales.
The title aside, you might add some chapters with more relevant games.
It is very hard to avoid a draw as white.
Book authors - or their editors - chose book titles to boost sales.
The title aside, you might add some chapters with more relevant games.
It is very hard to avoid a draw as white.
It's a common practice nowadays that the book author is a famous person and somebody else writes the book.
<Comment deleted by user>
#19
Why would you decline a Stafford Gambit?
To refute a gambit, accept it.
Why would you decline a Stafford Gambit?
To refute a gambit, accept it.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.