i scolars mated a 1700

@arushvemuri That would be Fool's Mate, not Scholar's Mate. It's strange to upvote your own comment, especially when you're wrong.

0/10 clickbait, thumbs down and unsubscribed

wrong @arushvemuri that is fools mate

#7

Must be Post-Graduates!

@yabbadabbadooooooo isn't it still just a scholars mate, but not a 4 move #

> i [sic] scolars [sic] mated a 1700

Thou art no ſcholler, ſir, for that thy ſpellyng leaueth much to bee deſired.

Hey, looks like Chaucer just ragged on ya!

Fool's mate. It's bullet chess though, so it's not weird to see strange mistakes.

@Silver_Surfer
agreed

Isn't a fool's mate 1.e4 f5. 2.exf5 g5 3. Qh5#