lichess.org
Donate

How good do I have to be these days?

>I played in a classical tournament this afternoon out of the four players I played between them they had four inaccuracies,

These stats are often meaningless, especially if one side gets a big edge early on. In #8, the game was pretty much over at move 10 according to StockFish (+4.5).
Ok @SOJB , here we go...

Game 2/4:



2. ...Nf6. The Petrow/Russian Defence. A nice active/counterattacking try to get white out of their comfort zone, since handling the positions after 2. ...Nc6 is way more common to the most of us.

3. Nxe5 d6. The absolute Petrow main line, played almost exclusively in the masters database as a response to 2. ...Nf6. Everything is fine.

4. ...Nc6? Wait... what? I'm not an expert in the Petrow, but isn't it the whole point of the first few opening moves, to let white grab our e5-pawn, then attack the white knight/force it back and regain the so very important central pawn with 4. ...Nxe4 ?

By ignoring the recapture on e4 you are left 1 whole pawn behind, with no compensation. One can even go further and say, that you are dwon 1,5 pawns, since the central pawns usually have a practically higher value than the pawns on the edge of the board.

Technically you are already lost on move 4 against a ~300 points higher rated opponent.
I could stop here, but let's see, what else can be learned from the game...

This is a critical moment. You just blundered a pawn for no compensation and therefore have to reassess the position.
Think about what changed because of your mistake? What could be your opponent's plan to punish your mistake even more?
Take yourselves 5-10 min. to think about that.

If you did that, you maybe came to the conclusion, that the big plus of your opponent's position is his strong centre and that he would love to keep that centre and stop you from challenging/destroying it. How could you challenge the centre? With the move 5. ...d5! How could your opponent keep his centre and stop you from challenging it, if you wouldn't find the move ...d5 ? With the move c4, reaching a weird sort of Stonewall or Maroczy bind position, where you never ever will be able to challence the centre with ...d5 again for the rest of the game!

5. ...h6. Yes, like in Game 1/4 you play your beloved ...h6-move instead.

White then returned the favour and missed the opportunity to "strategically" end the game by playing 6. c4!
You therefore still had the chance to play ...d5 but I see, this idea was not in your mind.

6. ...Bg4. 7. h3
Oh the irony - the opponent plays your beloved h-pawn move, but in contrast to you, he knows when to play it. You now have to either exchange the bishop or move it away from it's beautiful long diagonal and lose a valuable tempo.

7. ...Bxf3. Thinking for only 10 seconds on this decision is just way too short. Ironically again you choose the worse option.
Principle: When you are behind in material, you should keep pieces on the board. By (again - see Game 1/4) exchanging your currently most active piece, you do all the work for your opponent.

Ok, I'll stop here.

Conclusion:
- Blundering the game in less that 10 moves (this time on move 4)
- You have to know at least a few main lines AND some typical ideas on your chosen opening.
- Senseless trades, especially if material down => WATCH THOSE 2 VIDEOS of Igor Smirnov, please!

Cya later.
@derkleineJo thankyou for your time and effort. Yes I’m not very good , thinking I get that now !
@SOJB Don't worry about my writing style. In no way I want to offend you - think of it as a chance to improve your chess and thereby enjoy it even more.

Keep up the challenge! It doesn't matter how "good" you play chess. Nobody's value as a human is based on their chess skill. Your rating munber is nothing more than stupid zeroes and ones in a database.
@SOJB I'll analyze game 3/4 anyway (for my own improvement). Should I post it here or not?
@derkleineJo said in #16:
> @SOJB I'll analyze game 3/4 anyway (for my own improvement). Should I post it here or not?
No I can’t take anymore xxx
@derkleineJo said in #18:
> @SOJB Ok, I'll respect that.

>
> Bye and good luck on your lifelong chess journey.

Thanks for your time and effort and helping me, it’s very kind of you to give up your time to help me ,I will think about what you wrote and take it on board, obviously I have thoughts behind my moves and why I play them but obviously not the correct thinking. I will have to seriously think about my chess and if I want to progress or not. Once again thankyou ,peace up, SOJB xxx
@Katoh1 said in #12:
> h6 is okay, Bxd2 is a bad, e5 is horrible.

move 7 where he gives up his dark squared bishop and has loads of weak dark squares
i scratched my head there , although the computer did not flag it as bad

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.